Legal Opinion

Atchley v. City of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1984No. Civ. 7374PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GALLAGHER, J. *

On May 12, 1980, appellants filed a complaint for declaratory, injunctive and compensatory relief. A court trial was held in March 1982. The court entered judgment for respondent City of Fresno.

Statement of the Facts

Allan Atchley, Curtis Bosch, Jack Enos, Duane Garey, and Mark Smith are retired employees of the police department of respondent City of Fresno. Each appellant is receiving a retirement benefit from respondent City of Fresno due to a service-connected disability.

The Council of the City of Fresno established two retirement systems in 1955. One of these systems…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Akins v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. BaniquedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API