Legal Opinion
Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1984No. 17652-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Betty Ann Tarr, brought this petition for review of an opinion and decision of Division Two of the Court of Appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
We must decide the following issue: Does a purported answer, filed after an entry of default but before application for a default judgment, constitute an appearance entitling the defaulting party to notice of default judgment under Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 55(b)(2)?
The facts necessary for a disposition of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Austin v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- McClintock v. Serv-Us BakersArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Martin v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- National Homes Corp. v. Totem Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Hood v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Bys Inc. v. SmoudiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Sullivan & Brugnatelli Advertising Co. v. Century Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Arizona Real Estate Inv., Inc. v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.