Arizona Real Estate Inv., Inc. v. Schrader
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 Edward Schrader appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of forcible detainer. Because the superior court improperly applied service of process rules applicable to special detainer proceedings, we vacate the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On September 9, 2009, Arizona Real Estate purchased a Scottsdale home at a trustee’s sale. Arizona Real Estate gave Schrader, the current occupant and previous owner, written notice to vacate the premises. When Schrader failed to do so, Arizona Real Estate filed a forcible detainer action pursuant to Arizona Revised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barlage v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Wertheim v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Hilgeman v. American Mortgage Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- National Homes Corp. v. Totem Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Frey v. Allstate Law Firm PCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Secure Ventures v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Wilson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021