Legal Opinion

Hood v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 20, 1982No. 53,565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

Defendants appeal from the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment foreclosing two mortgages on several lots owned by them in the city of Concordia.

The chronology is as follows:

January 9, 1981, petition filed together with affidavit for service by publication.

February 2,1981, service complete, answer date fixed as February 26, 1981.

February 26, 1981, motion for default judgment.

May 3 or 4, 1981, defendants have actual notice of the suit, although never served personally or by mail. Defendant Gene Haynes visits Concordia, examines the property and the court file.

June…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Charlton L. Davis & Company, P. C. v. Fedder Data Center, Inc., Financial Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Laura Wilson v. Moore and Associates, Inc., Dba Uni-Check, Fdba Telecheck Hawaii, a Hawaii CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Cockrell v. World's Finest Chocolate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Adamson v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Universal Modular Structures, Inc. v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  5. Wellsville Bank v. SutterbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API