Legal Opinion
Cellu Tissue Corp. v. Blake Equipment Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 1996No. 14606PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial to the court. The plaintiff cross appeals. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) decided the case on a theory of negligence not raised in the complaint and (2) found that the defendant was negligent based on the facts presented at trial.1 The plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly determined that *415the plaintiff failed to sustain its burden of proof as to its breach of contract claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural facts are relevant to a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Remington Investments, Inc. v. National Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- MacLean v. Town of DarienConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Muller v. MullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.