Legal Opinion

May v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1991No. Nos. 90-1735, 90-1736PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, Timothy May and Janet Phillips challenge the amount of their awards of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Under the EAJA, a court shall award attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party in certain civil actions against the United States unless it finds that the government’s position was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The district court determined that both May and Phillips were prevailing parties and that the government’s position was not substantially justified. 729…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Baker v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Animal Lovers Volunteer Ass'n v. CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Phillips v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Jayne Mathews-Sheets v. Michael AstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Charles A. Payne v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Kyser v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Olympic Marine Services, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API