Legal Opinion
Animal Lovers Volunteer Ass'n v. Carlucci
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1989No. Nos. 86-6428, 86-6679PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellants brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, and the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4382, challenging the decision of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to eradicate the red fox population of the Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge. The project is intended to protect two endangered species of birds believed threatened by the foxes. The Service prepared an Environmental Assessment of the project which concluded eradication of the foxes would have no significant impact on the human environment. Consequently, no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sorenson v. MinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sorenson v. MinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- May v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Jose R. Montes Eduardo Castro Juan A. Monterrosa v. Richard L. Thornburgh Roy DanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Marks v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.