Legal Opinion

Marriage of Castonguay v. Castonguay

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1981No. 51719PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this marriage dissolution proceeding the trial court ordered that half the husband’s shares in a closely held corporation be transferred to his wife, notwithstanding a provision in the corporate articles prohibiting stock transfers without first offering the shares to the corporation and the other stockholders at book value. The respondent husband appeals this ruling. He also appeals the trial court’s valuation of his shares of stock in a second corporation. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

1. The most important asset of this 22-year marriage is Paul Castonguay’s 43%…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Earthman's, Inc. v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Model Clothing House v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Marriage of Kostelnik v. KostelnikCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Rohling v. RohlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. In Re Marriage of DevickAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API