Legal Opinion

Hertz v. Hertz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1975No. 45191PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a divorce action in which the trial court resolved issues of custody, alimony, and property settlement, and granted each party a divorce. Defendant, Lloyd A. Hertz, moved for a new trial or for amended findings with regard to the alimony and property awards. Defendant now appeals from a denial of that motion and from the judgment.

Plaintiff, Barbara Hertz, and defendant were married in 1949. The couple now has one minor child. Defendant’s principal asset is the Hertz Manufacturing Co., Inc., in which he is the sole shareholder. The corporation is a wholesale jobber of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marie H. Hamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, William Hamm, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API