Legal Opinion

Marriage of Rohling v. Rohling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1986No. C9-84-1060PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Mabel Rohling seeks further review of a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision that reversed the district court’s distribution of marital property under Minn.Stat. § 518.58 (1984). The court of appeals held that it was an abuse of discretion for the district court to distribute, as marital property, two retirement funds received by her husband, Carl Rohling, during the separation of the parties. The appeals court also reversed the district court’s determination that Mabel need not pay Carl’s equitable lien on the homestead for 15 years. We reverse the court of appeals.

Carl and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Marriage of Rohling v. RohlingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marriage of Valento v. ValentoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Herron v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Maher v. MaherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Carlson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Doering v. DoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API