Marriage of Kostelnik v. Kostelnik

OPINION

RANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Roger Kostelnik appeals from the trial court’s order which divided the parties’ assets and required him to pay maintenance of $1800 per month for seven years. Patricia Kostelnik also sought review under Rule 106, Minn.R.Civ.App.P. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the trial court to make a finding of Roger’s net income and set maintenance at a reasonable level.

FACTS

Roger and Patricia Kostelnik were married in 1957. Roger owns an insurance business and Patricia worked as a registered nurse until 1979. At the time of the hearing she was…