Lazo v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Senior Judge:
Vicente Lazo was convicted of one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3006 (2001). He makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that the charging document lacked particularity about the date and time of the alleged offense, and thus did not provide adequate notice to appellant of the charges against him; (2) that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to independently inquire about potential Jencks Act material; and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chamontae A. Walker & Corey D. Yates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Medina v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Darweshi McRoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bank of America, N.A. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.