Legal Opinion
Medina v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 2013No. Nos. 08-CM-1559, 11-CO-650PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
After a bench trial, appellant Jose Medina was convicted of one count of assault.1 In this consolidated appeal of his conviction and the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant argues three grounds for reversal or remand of his conviction: (1) there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he assaulted the victim; (2) the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial without conducting a hearing; and (8) the government failed to disclose Jencks materials created by the prosecutor and several…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jerome Proctor, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.