Legal Opinion

JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2016No. 14-CM-125PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEESE, Associate Judge:

Appellant Jesus A. Hernandez challenges his assault conviction, arguing that the evidence was insufficient and that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry into whether the United States was required to disclose notes taken by a prosecutor during an interview of a> government witness. ■ We hold that the evidence was sufficient, and We remand for further inquiiy into the disclosure issue.

I

The evidence at trial was as follows. At the time of the offense, Mr. Hernandez was living with his girlfriend, Jemima Ar-guétar-Avila. They went to a party together,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ERIC GARDNER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. RAMON R. CHERRY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Dominic A. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Chew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Chew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API