Legal Opinion

Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 12, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–03580–EMCPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs allege that Ford manufactured vehicles with defective door latches which permit the door sensors to become contaminated over time, and thus to falsely signal that a door is not closed when in fact it is, posing a variety of safety risks. Plaintiffs bring causes of action for breach of express and implied warranty and under consumer fraud laws for failure to disclose a material defect. Defendant moves to dismiss all claims. As explained below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. James Smith v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Rojas v. Bosch Solar Energy Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Ahern v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Alejandra Arteaga v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  5. Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API