Rojas v. Bosch Solar Energy Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
Defendant Bosch Solar Energy Corporation ("Defendant" or "Bosch") moves to dismiss the first amended complaint ("FAC") filed by Plaintiffs Steve and Andrea Rojas ("Plaintiffs") for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court has considered *1121the briefing, the oral arguments presented at the hearing on April 25, 2019, and the applicable legal authorities. The motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND for the reasons discussed below.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs allege the following facts,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Coelho v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- DEVANE v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Smith v. Rack Room Shoes, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025