Legal Opinion
Auburn Lumber Co. v. City of Auburn
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1968No. Civ. 11562PublishedCited by 3 opinions
James IC. Norman for'Plaintiff and Appellant." -•
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
The City of Auburn conducted proceedings for the formation of a parking district under the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 31500 et seq.). Petitioner Auburn Lumber Company, a retail building materials merchant, protested inclusion of its business premises. The city council rejected the protest, fixed district boundaries embracing the lumber company’s property and found that all property within these boundaries would be benefited by the project. Auburn Lumber then petitioned for review by mandate in the superior court, which, after considering the evidence before the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Alexander v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dawson v. Town of Los Altos HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cogan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Auburn Lumber Co. v. City of AuburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968