Legal Opinion

Tomsel v. Green

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1942No. Appeals, 273 and 274PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenworthey, J.,

Opinion by

In this negligence case defendants appeal from the refusal of their motion for judgment n. o.v. The action was for the damage to an automobile owned by plaintiff, Gerald Tomsel. Defendants offered no evidence; their principal contention throughout has been that Tomsel, who was operating the car at the time of the collision, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. It seems to have been taken for granted by the parties and the court below that if Tomsel was contributorily negligent, Federal Insurance Company, the other plaintiff, would likewise not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frank v. PleetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Mehler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mannix v. LambertonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Knies v. KraftsowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Robinson Et Ux. v. OndackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Levine v. Pittsburgh Wheeling Truck Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API