Legal Opinion

Robinson Et Ux. v. Ondack

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1942No. Appeals, 117 and 118PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

This is a negligence case arising out of the collision of two automobiles. Defendant appeals from the re fusal of her motion for judgment n.o.v. The sole question is whether wife-plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. In stating the facts, we resolve them and the inferences in the light most favorable to plaintiffs.

The accident happened a little after two o’clock in the afternoon of January 11, 1941, at the intersection of Easton Eoad and Michener Street, Philadelphia. Michener Street, at this point, is 20 feet wide; the paved portion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Magesiny v. T. M. Smithian Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Tomsel v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Holland v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Levine v. Pittsburgh Wheeling Truck Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Pugh v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Graev v. MandellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API