Robinson Et Ux. v. Ondack
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
This is a negligence case arising out of the collision of two automobiles. Defendant appeals from the re fusal of her motion for judgment n.o.v. The sole question is whether wife-plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. In stating the facts, we resolve them and the inferences in the light most favorable to plaintiffs.
The accident happened a little after two o’clock in the afternoon of January 11, 1941, at the intersection of Easton Eoad and Michener Street, Philadelphia. Michener Street, at this point, is 20 feet wide; the paved portion of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Magesiny v. T. M. Smithian Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Tomsel v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Holland v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Levine v. Pittsburgh Wheeling Truck Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pugh v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Graev v. MandellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.