Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Pavitt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1931No. Appeal, 193PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff brought this action against M. E. Pavitt and Ethel Kale, jointly, charging them with causing the death of her husband by the negligent operation of their respective automobiles. Defendant Kale’s automobile at the time of the fatality was driven by her daughter, aged eighteen years. Pavitt, aged twenty-six, was accompanied by his wife. Miss Kale was accompanied by her mother, sister and brother. They sat in the rear seat. Plaintiff’s husband was on May 6, 1930, sitting in the front doorway of a store where he was employed. This store was located on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Gilles v. LeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Boggs v. Jewell Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Majewski v. LempkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Graff v. Scott Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API