Mehler v. Doyle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 112, Jan. T., 1922, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. Erie Co., Sept. T., 1920, No. 357, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Lillian Mebler v. John Doyle et al., doing business as J. & M. Doyle. Trespass for personal injuries. Tbe opinion of tbe Supreme Court states tbe facts. At tbe trial tbe court entered a compulsory nonsuit wbicb it subsequently refused to take off. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was refusal to take off nonsuit, quoting order.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The refusal to remove the nonsuit entered in this case is affirmed on the following excerpts from the opinion of the. court below: “On May 5, 1920, at ten minutes to seven, on the morning of a clear day, an autotruck, then north of 18th Street, was being driven southwardly [mear] the center of Parade Street, which is a paved [highway] in the City of Erie, 68 feet wide. A bicycle, then south of 18th Street, was being ridden northwardly [on Parade Street] about five feet from the east curb. ■......There were no other vehicles on the street in that vicinity. The truck turned…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harvey v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Lane v. E. A. Mullen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Frank v. PleetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Marsh v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.