Legal Opinion

Mannix v. Lamberton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, 39PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

From the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. y. in this action of trespass for damages to an automobile owned by plaintiff, she .has brought this appeal. The damages complained of resulted.from a right-angle collision between her -automobile and One-owned and operated by defendant. Her car, in which she was riding, was being operated by her brother-in-law, E. L. Strucher. The collision occurred at the intersection of Fourth Street and the east lane of Mohawk Drive in the City of Erie. Plaintiff’s car was proceeding east on Fourth Street, an unpaved street…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. McMahen v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Brayman v. DewolfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Johnston Testers, Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Furia v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Wynkoop v. McLendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API