Legal Opinion
United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 1, 2015No. 2015-1166PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade dismissing the Government’s penalty claim based on negligence for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies under 19 U.S.C. § 1592. United States v. Nitek Elecs., Inc., 844 F.Supp.2d 1298 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012), recons. denied, 2012 WL 3195084 (Ct. Int’l Trade Aug. 7, 2012). Specifically, the Government argues that it should not be barred from seeking a penalty claim in court at a culpability level that is lower than that administratively asserted by U.S. Customs and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. HussCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Univar USA, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2016
- PAO Severstal v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.