Legal Opinion

ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 25, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-49; Court 16-00168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Katzmann, Judge:

This case poses the question of whether a foreign exporter and producer, having obtained a de minimis subsidy rate in an investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), and not being subject to a countervailing duty (“CVD”) order, nonetheless has standing to challenge by cross-claim Commerce’s application of Adverse Facts Available (“AFA”) to calculate that subsidy rate. Put another way, where a party ultimately prevails at the administrative level in Commerce’s investigation, must its challenge to that proceeding fail because there is no case or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arcelormittal U.S. LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API