Legal Opinion

Favorite v. Superior Court of Riverside Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1919No. L. A. No. 6096PublishedCited by 22 opinions

PROCEEDING in prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Riverside County and Hugh H. Craig, Judge thereof, from making any order in a pending cause, except an order changing the place of trial to the nearest or most accessible superior court, the judge of which is not disqualified from acting. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the superior court of Riverside County from proceeding in a cause pending in said court wherein the said petitioners are plaintiffs and the Security Investment Company and others are defendants. This proceeding for prohibition was begun in the district court of appeal for the second district and after decision there was transferred to this 'court for rehearing. The original petition was filed on December 16, 1918. An amended petition was filed on December 19, 1918.

Honorable Hugh H. Craig is the regularly elected judge of the superior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howell v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Livermore v. BrundageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Finn v. SpagnoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Krumdick v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Mansfield v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Eggers v. National Radio Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API