Legal Opinion

Howell v. Budd

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1891No. 14539PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent, who is one of the judges of the superior court of San Joaquin County, from acting as judge in the matter of the application of the petitioner herein for the revocation of letters of administration issued to one Eugene Kay, upon the estate of William B. Johnson, deceased, and for her own appointment as administratrix in the place and stead of said Kay.

For the relief desired, petitioner relies upon the following allegations of her petition: —

“1. That the sons of the respondent (in conjunction with two other attorneys)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Burbank v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API