Krumdick v. Crump
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for, a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an original proceeding by mandamus. The petitioner is plaintiff in an action (Krumdick v. White) commenced in the superior court of Lake County in the year 1887. The respondent, who was the attorney for the defendant in that actiou, has been since January, 1891, judge of the superior court of Lake County. In December, 1891, the judgment of the superior court of Lake County in the action referred to was reversed by this court, and the cause remanded for a new trial. (Krumdick v. White, 92 Cal. 143.) On the 14th of January, 1892, the remittitur was filed in the superior court, and on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Livermore v. BrundageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Holbrook v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Krumdick v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Upton v. UptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by18 opinions
- Favorite v. Superior Court of Riverside Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Independent Publishing Co. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Marshall v. SittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- People v. EbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Best v. ParkesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.