Legal Opinion

Troy v. Hallgarth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. Action in a justice’s court by Thomas Troy against Charles Hallgarth. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the circuit court, in which a judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This action was originally commenced in the Justice’s Court of Elgin District, Union County, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason óf defendant’s sheep breaking into plaintiff’s inclosure and destroying his hay of the reasonable value of $24. The answer, after denying upon information and belief the material allegations of the complaint, avers that, if the *163sheep destroyed plaintiff’s hay, it was because he did not maintain a lawful fence around the same. The reply having put in issue the allegations of new matter contained in the answer, a trial was had, resulting in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pennybecker v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Solomon v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Inhabitants of Newtown v. Inhabitants of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ferguson v. ByersOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lowe v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Matheny v. Bank of NashvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API