Legal Opinion

Salitan v. Dashney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Samuel S. Salitan and David Little, co-partners doing business as Credit Industrial Company, filed this action in the district court of Washington county to recover certain sums allegedly due them from defendants by virtue of four trade acceptances. The single complaint contained four separate causes of action, each for the principal amount due on one of the trade acceptances with interest thereon. The principal amout claimed on the four causes of action, together with interest to November 29, 1955, the date the complaint was filed, totaled $1,048.57.

The primary question…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Huffman v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API