Lord v. Goldberg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for his wrongful dismissal from the employment of defendants. It is alleged in the complaint that defendants were carrying on the business of grocers in the city of San Francisco; that they negotiated with plaintiff to enter into their employment ¿s solicitor for customers for their groceries, teas, wines, etc.; and that on the twenty-fourth day of November, 1886, it was agreed by and between plaintiff and defendants that in consideration of his entering into their employment as *598such solicitor, and using all his efforts to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Dashiell v. SlingerlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bailey v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by58 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.