Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Byers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Polk: Reuben P. Boise, Judge. This is a proceeding by a writ to review the judgment of a justice’s court, and is on appeal from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing the writ.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

• This is a proceeding to review a judgment of an inferior court. The defendant, in an action against the plaintiff in the justice’s court of District No. 5, Polk County, alleged in her complaint that she was the owner and entitled to the possession of a bay mare valued at $100, a colt at $25, a bay horse at $100, a buggy at $20, and a set of harness at $4, which the plaintiff attached in said county in an action wherein C. L. Pearce was plaintiff and J. A. Byers defendant; that such seizure was wrongful, and by reason thereof she was damaged in the sum of $25, and prayed for the return of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dayton v. Board of EqualizationOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Camp v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  3. Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Corbell v. ChildersOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Litchfield v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Holmes v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Delovage v. Old Oregon Creamery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API