Legal Opinion

Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1923PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The plaintiff has moved to dismiss the defendant’s appeal. A chronology of the events involved is as follows:

In the action to recover $250 as damages for the demolition of a truck belonging to the plaintiff’s intestate, by one of the defendant’s trains, the plainifif recovered judgment for that amount on April 6, 1923. *451On May 9th, following, the defendant served and filed its notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. On the 17th of the same month, the undertaking on appeal was served and filed. No objections to the sufficiency of the surety were ever filed. Chapter 153 of the General Laws of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moss v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Drinker v. Ritter, Lowe & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hoffart v. Lindquist & Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Brown v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API