Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1934No. Civ. 1498PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

On December 31, 1931, plaintiff was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce. During the pendency of the divorce^ action the parties entered into a contract settling their property rights and providing that defendant pay plaintiff $125 each month for the support of their two minor children, the payments to continue "during such time as the said child or children shall remain in the care and custody of said second party, and until such child or children shall become of age, marry or become self-supporting ’ \ The interlocutory decree, in reference to this contract, said: “It is ordered,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Blackshear v. BlackshearHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Grand v. GrandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API