Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1930No. Docket No. 272PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
On March 14, 1928, respondent was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from appellant, which provided in part as follows:
“And it further appearing to the court that the parties hereto have mutually effected a settlement of their property rights wherein and whereby the defendant herein was given the sum of five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars in cash as and for a complete settlement and adjustment of her community interest and interests held in joint tenancy between the parties and the defendant having made, executed and delivered to plaintiff deeds to all real property held in joint…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Gates v. GatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hoster v. HosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Shibley v. ShibleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.