Southern Pacific Railroad v. Willett
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are without dispute. The complaint in the action, which is one to condemn real property for railroad purposes, was filed on March 16, 1899. The answer of defendant and appellant was filed June 27, 1899. Appellant filed with his answer a cross-complaint and, some six years later, on February 24, 1905, filed an amended cross-complaint. The answer of plaintiff and respondent to the amended cross-complaint was filed June 8, 1905. No proceedings were taken and no stipulations, documents or other pleadings were filed in the action from that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Wood, Curtis Co. v. Missouri Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
- Lewis v. Hammond Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bengel v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.