Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Amato
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 20, 2003No. CIV. 3:03CV355PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUDSON, District Judge.
This case is currently before the Court on Defendant’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [hereinafter “Rule”] 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Count III of the Complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Plaintiff filed a timely response, and pursuant to Rule 7(D) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the parties consented to submit the motion for determination on the pleadings.
I. Causes of Action
In the immediate case, Plaintiff, DIRECTV, Inc. (“Plaintiff’), alleges that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Martin Marietta Corporation v. International Telecommunications Satellite OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- McNair v. Lend Lease Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Direct TV, Inc. v. TreworgyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. ChildersDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HoseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.