Legal Opinion
Martin Marietta Corporation v. International Telecommunications Satellite Organization
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1993No. 92-1094PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
Martin Marietta agreed to launch a satellite for the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT), but the satellite ended up in a useless orbit. Martin Marietta then sought a declaratory judgment that it owed INTELSAT nothing under the agreement between the parties, and INTELSAT counterclaimed for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, gross negligence, and breach of contract. Martin Marietta moved to dismiss INTELSAT’s counterclaims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Weisman v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Davis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Arthur Wrightson v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Donn Milton, Dr. v. Iit Research InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Superior Bank, F.S.B. v. Tandem National Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Apex Oil Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.