Withington-Cooley Manuf'g Co. v. Kinney
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. This was a bill by Horace B. Kinney against the Withington-Cooley Manufacturing Company for infringement of a patent for an improvement in power presses. There was a decree for complainant in the court below, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
The complainant in the court below, Horace B. Kinney, is the inventor and sole owner of patent No. 264,837, which was issued September 19, 1882, for an improvement in power presses used in the manufacture of hoes and forks. The de*501fendant below was the Withington-Gooley Manufacturing Company, a corporation of the state of Michigan. The object of the bill was to enjoin and restrain the defendant company from using two power presses which complainant alleges infringe the improvement covered by his patent. Upon a final hearing there was a decree in favor of the complainant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Montross v. MabieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lukens Steel Co. v. American Locomotive Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- City of Boston v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898
- Neon Signal Devices, Inc. v. Alpha-Claude Neon Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
- Flannery Bolt Co. v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- Barber v. National Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.