Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Hovey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1914No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Shiawassee; Miner, J. Bill by Alonzo Griffin, as administrator of the estate of Henry 0. Hovey, deceased, against Hiram E. Hovey and Chloe M. Durham for the annulment of certain deeds. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The bill of complaint in this case is filed in the name of the administrator of the estate of Henry 0. Hovey, deceased, for the purpose of setting aside two deeds made by Henry 0. Hovey and his wife, one of which conveyed a farm of 100 acres to the defendant Hiram E. Hovey, a son, and the other a farm of 80 acres to the defendant Chloe M. Durham, a daughter. The bill also prays for an accounting on the part of Hiram E. Hovey of the proceeds and profits of said farms from the year 1890, when he assumed the management thereof, until July, 1911, when Henry 0. Hovey died, leaving a widow and *106three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Graham v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Glaze v. Three Rivers Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Compton v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Derham v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Brender v. StrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Flood v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Tackaberry v. MonteithMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API