Legal Opinion
Bower v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2011No. B223364PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J.
Jessica Bower appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corporation (collectively, AT&T) in this action based on Bower’s alleged payment of $15.50 as part of her purchase of a cellular telephone. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. Bower’s Original Complaint
On July 17, 2009, Bower filed a class action complaint against AT&T on behalf of herself individually and other AT&T customers alleging causes of action for violation of Civil Code section 1750 et…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.California Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Anderson v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- McCabe v. Daimler AGDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.