Legal Opinion
Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 27, 2012No. 10-01139 RSPublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This putative consumer class action challenges defendants’ representation that Arizona Iced Tea is “All Natural,” given that it contains high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and citric acid. Defendants move for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ six claims, advanced under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), California Business & Professions Code § 17200, et seq., False Advertising Law (FAL), id. at §…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Scotts EZ Seed LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.