Legal Opinion

Hale v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 2, 2012No. 10-822CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FOR FINAL JUDGMENT

LETTOW, Judge.

This case returns to the court after a remand to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“Army Board” or “ABCMR”). See Hale v. United States, No. 10-822C, 2011 WL 2268961 (Fed.Cl. June 9, 2011). Ms. Hale formerly was a licensed practical nurse serving in the United States Army Reserve, and she sought relief in this court in the form of back pay and disability benefits as well as correction of her military records. Id. at *1. The remand was premised upon the government’s representation that Ms. Hale had raised procedural issues which had not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Attia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API