Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 15, 2015No. 14-1158CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Military pay dispute; claim by dental surgeon for monetary relief stemming from the Navy’s alleged miscalculation of his obligated service period; retention bonus; 37 U.S.C. § 301e; incentive special pay; 37 U.S.C. § 302b

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this military pay case, plaintiff Robert M. Laughlin challenges the determination by the United States Navy (“Navy” or “government”) and the Board for Correction of Naval Records (“Navy Board”) of his active duty service obligation to the Navy following his military-funded medical training. Commander Laughlin received extensive training in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Anchor Tank Lines, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Bias v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Bias v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Sergent's Mechanical Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API