O'Brien v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Military pay case; Cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record; Jurisdiction—military pay benefits; Standard of review; Bannum; Use of Abbreviated Medical Evaluation Board Report Processing was proper under the regulations; Disability evaluation; Substantial evidence supported BCNR decision; Navy did not act arbitrarily and capriciously in not providing for further disability screening; Constructive service remedy unavailable; Plaintiffs cross-motion denied; Defendant motion granted.
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
This military pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- O'Hare v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Strahler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Thomassee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022