Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 29, 2015No. 12-554CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Military pay case; Cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record; Jurisdiction—military pay benefits; Standard of review; Bannum; Use of Abbreviated Medical Evaluation Board Report Processing was proper under the regulations; Disability evaluation; Substantial evidence supported BCNR decision; Navy did not act arbitrarily and capriciously in not providing for further disability screening; Constructive service remedy unavailable; Plaintiffs cross-motion denied; Defendant motion granted.

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

This military pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. O'Hare v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Strahler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Thomassee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API