Gay v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
This military pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. For the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion and DENIES plaintiffs cross-motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The administrative record in this ease reveals the following:
Nathanial Gay (plaintiff) served in the U.S. Marine Corps from July 1, 2002, to June 10, 2003. During this time, his medical records reveal that he was treated for various injuries, particularly to his foot, but not for any psychological ailments. On June 10, 2003, Mr. Gay was…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schmidt v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Meyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Schmidt v. MaybusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018