Legal Opinion
George v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 10, 1921No. 2 Div. 698PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The case was before this court on a former appeal. 186 Ala. 521, 65 South. 345. The suit is now upon the common counts and' for breach of a building contract in failing to pay the contractor the balance due after completion of the building.
The legal effect or substance of the contract (4 Encyc. Pl. & Pr. 916; Moundville Lbr. Co. v. Warren, 203 Ala. 488, 83 South. 479; Doullut & Williams v. Hoffman, 204 Ala. 33, 86 South. 73) signed by the parties (not the general specifications and addenda thereto) is averred in count 8, to which many grounds of demurrer were assigned. The overruling of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Brooklyn Life Insurance v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Doullut Williams v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Hackney v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Bell v. Western Ry.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Eskridge v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.