Eskridge v. Brown

THOMAS. J.

The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrer to the bill.

1. The conveyances made the subject of the bill were sufficiently averred, and not required to be set out in hsec verba. Story’s Eq. PI. § 241; Daniell’s Ch. PL (6th Am. Ed.) 376; Fletcher’s Eq. Pl. & Pr. § 99; 4 Encyc. P. & Pr. 916; Sprague v. Shields, 61 Ala. 428, 432; Houston v. Williamson, 81 Ala., 483, South. 193. See George v. Roberts (Ala. Sup.) 92 South. 1; 1 Moundville Lbr. Co. v. Warren, 203 Ala. 488, 83 South. 479; Doullut v. Hoffman, 204 Ala. 33, 86 South. 73; Davis v. Campbell, 3 Stew. 319, 321.

2. The bill…