Hackney v. Yarbrough
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The bill in one of its major features invokes a judgment creditor’s remedy fox-discovery of assets of his debtor under the provisions of section 7343 of the Code.
While the bill seeks to have certain transfers of property declared fraudulent and void, as against, the complainant’s debt, its main purpose is to discover property, which it is averred the judgment debtor owns, and which is so concealed and hidden as to render it impossible to reach and subject the same to the satisfaction of complainant’s demand without the aid of a court of equity.
The eleventh paragraph of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Ellis v. VandergriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Hayes v. BettsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Groover v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Love v. RennieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Cook v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Murphy v. PickleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.