Legal Opinion

Ed Hockaday & Co. v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1936No. 26690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was originally commenced on the 8th day of October, 1932, in a justice of the peace court, in the city of Watonga, Blaine county, Okla., by defendant in error, against one Joe Jantzen, to recover the sum of $100, alleged to be due for rent on certain pasture lands for the year commencing August 1, 1931, and ending August 1, 1932. Upon the filing of affidavit in garnishment by defendant in error, garnishment process was issued and served upon plaintiff in error, Ed Hockaday & Company, which filed its answer denying it was indebted to or had property in its possession belonging to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Tucker v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Wright v. Farmers Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Williamson v. Oklahoma National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. S. O. Maxey & Co. v. CrowlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Sperry v. RennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Carter v. Carl Merveldt & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API