Legal Opinion

Wright v. Farmers Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1925No. 15997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, 0.

This appeal involves the question of the procedure to be followed in causing a deficiency to be charged against the estate of a deceased, remaining after the sale of personal -property under foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The Farmers National Bank submits the proposition that proceedings had in the foreclosure of the chattel mortgage, from which the deficiency followed, excused the presentation of the deficiency as a claim to the administratrix for allowance. The adminis-tratrix insists that the claim is controlled by section 1234, Comp. St. of 1921, and that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Brennan v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Timmons v. Hanna Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. PrestonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ed Hockaday & Co. v. RandolphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Spruill v. Reserve Loan Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API